The Latin American Journal of Asia Studies is currently accepting submissions for the special issue "Korean Studies from Latin America." This call for papers aims to explore various perspectives on Korea-Latin America relations, covering political, economic, cultural, and other aspects. While this call is broad and seeks to encompass a variety of approaches and viewpoints, some of the encouraged topics include:
Diplomacy and International Relations: Analysis of diplomatic relations, bilateral and multilateral agreements, and the influence of South Korea in Latin America, and vice versa.
Cultural Diplomacy: Examination of South Korea’s soft power in Latin America, particularly through initiatives such as K-pop, technology, public diplomacy, and their role in shaping public perception between both regions.
Global Economy and Trade: The impact of economic and trade relations between South Korea and Latin America, including treaties, investments, and cooperation in key sectors such as technology, innovation, and energy.
Migration: Study of Korean communities in Latin America and migration dynamics, as well as the cultural and social tensions and synergies arising from these movements.
Historical and Comparative Perspectives: Research on the historical ties between South Korea and Latin America, comparisons with other intercontinental relations, and how these have evolved over time.
Submit your article here! Deadline: October 15, 2025
Please read through all the information available at the following link.
In recent decades, China has emerged as a global scientific power. This position has been accompanied by an expansion of its international scientific cooperation network. However, despite China's consolidation as one of Latin America's main economic and political partners, scientific integration with the region has not followed a parallel trajectory. This study analyses patterns of scientific cooperation through international co-publications, revealing asymmetries and opportunities in a relationship that is below its potential. The findings show that, although there has been an increase in the number of joint publications, the intensity of collaboration is still low and uneven. In terms of the number of joint publications, China ranks between 20th and 13th as a partner of the countries in the region, a position that is not related to its current scientific relevance or its economic integration with the region. On the other hand, the Latin American region as a whole participates in only 2% of China's international co-publications. The article argues that for the relationship between Latin America and China to reach its potential, it is necessary for Latin American countries to define a strategy for engagement with China in which scientific cooperation plays a prominent role, while at the same time developing appropriate cooperation institutions and funding mechanisms.
Adams, J. (2013). The fourth age of research. Nature, 497(7451), 557-560.
Al-Janabi, A. (28 de abril de 2022). Publish in English or perish. Chemistry World. https://www.chemistryworld.com/careers/publish-in-english-or-perish/4014820.article
Banco Mundial. (2021). World Development Indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
Bernasconi, A. (2008). Is There a Latin American Model of the University? Comparative Education Review, 52(1), 27-52. https://doi.org/10.1086/524305
Borquez, A. y Bravo, C. (2021). Who are China’s strategic economic partners in South America? Asian Education and Development Studies, 10(3), 445–456. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-09-2019-0153
Bustelo, S. y Rubiolo, M. F. (2023). Hoja de ruta para una integración sostenible entre Argentina y China. Fundar. http://hdl.handle.net/11336/240930
Cao, C., Appelbaum, R. P., Han, X., Parker, R. y Simon, D. F. (2020). Innovation in China: Challenging the Global Science and Technology System.
Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. (2023). Perspectivas del Comercio Internacional de América Latina y el Caribe 2023. Cambios estructurales y tendencias en el comercio mundial y regional: retos y oportunidades.
Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Sugimoto, C. R. y Larivière, V. (2019). Follow the leader: On the relationship between leadership and scholarly impact in international collaborations. PLOS ONE, 14(6), e0218309. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218309
Colombo, S. y Angelis, I. D. (2021). La República Popular China y Estados Unidos: revolución científico-tecnológica y disputa tecnológica en el siglo XXI. Revista mexicana de ciencias políticas y sociales, 66(243), 163–189.
Consejo de Estado de la República Popular China. (2006). Plan de Mediano y Largo Plazo para el Desarrollo de la Ciencia y la Tecnología (2006-2020).
Consejo de Estado de la República Popular China. (2021). Outline of the 14th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development and Long-Range Objectives Through the Year 2035.
Consejo de Estado de la República Popular China. (2024). Informe Sobre la Labor del Gobierno. Presentado el 5 de marzo de 2024 ante la II Sesión de la XIV Asamblea Popular Nacional.
Didou Aupetit, S. y Gérard, E. (2009). Fuga de cerebros, movilidad académica, redes científicas: Perspectivas latinoamericanas. IESALC.
Dussel Peters, E. (2021). América Latina y el Caribe-China: Más allá de la moda de su análisis socioeconómico. LASA Forum, 52(3), 25–29.
Dussel Peters, E. (2024). Monitor de la infraestructura china en América Latina y el Caribe 2024.
Ferchen, M. (2011). China–Latin America relations: Long-term boon or short-term boom? The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 4(1), 55–86.
Freeman, C. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. Pinter Publishers.
Gaida, J., Wong-Leung, J., Robin, S. y Cave, D. (2023). ASPI’s Critical Technology Tracker: The global race for future power.
Glänzel, W. y Schubert, A. (2004). Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. En Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems (pp. 257–276). Springer Netherlands.
Girado, G. A. (2017). ¿Cómo hicieron los chinos? Algunas de las causas del gran desarrollo del gigante asiático. Editorial Astrea.
Girado, G. A. (2021). Un mundo made in China: La larga marcha hacia la creación de un nuevo orden mundial. Capital Intelectual.
Gu, S. y Lundvall, B. (2006). China’s Innovation System and the Move Toward Harmonious Growth and Endogenous Innovation. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 8(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2006.8.1.1
Guo, J. (2023). The political economy of China–Latin America relations: the making of a post-boom paradigm. China International Strategy Review, 5(1), 113–138
Harari, Y. N. (2016). Homo Deus: Breve historia del mañana. Debate.
He, D., Tang, F., Chen, T., Luo, X. y Yang, F. (2023). Analysis and thinking on developing evolution of national innovation system. Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 38(2), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20230113002
Hiratuka, C. y Diegues, A. C. (2023). Notas sobre el Plan Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial de Nueva Generación de China. Economía, comercio e inversión, 35.
Instituto de Estudios de América Latina de la Academia de Ciencias Sociales de China. (2024). Report on China-Latin American and the Caribbean countries jointly advancing the belt and road development CASS. Office of the Leading Group for Promoting the Belt and Road Initiative. Institute of Latin American Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. China Social Sciences Press
Lixu, L. (2004). China’s higher education reform 1998–2003: A summary. Asia Pacific education review, 5, 14–22.
López, D. y Muñoz, F. (2021). China’s trade policy towards Latin America: An analysis of free trade agreements policy. Asian Education and Development Studies, 10(3), 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-08-2019-0133
Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.). (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter Publishers.
Lundvall, B. Å., Joseph, K. J., Chaminade, C. y Vang, J. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries: building domestic capabilities in a global setting. Edward Elgar Publishing
Luukkonen, T., Persson, O. y Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology y Human Values, 17(1), 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399201700106
Lyons, E., Colglazier, E. W., Wagner, C. S., Börner, K., Dooley, D. M., Mote, C. D. y Roco, M. C. (2016). How collaborating in international science helps America. Science & Diplomacy, 5(2).
Narin, F., Stevens, K. y Whitlow, E. S. (1991). Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics, 21, 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02093973
National Science Foundation. (2023). Publications Output: U.S. Trends and International Comparisons. Science and Engineering Indicators 2024 (NSB-2023-33). https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb202333/
Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press
Mazzucato, M. (2013). The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. Anthem Press.
Ma, W. (2007). The flagship university and China’s economic reform. En World Class Worldwide: Transforming Research Universities in Asia and Latin America (pp. 31–53).
Mohrman, K. (2008). The emerging global model with Chinese characteristics. Higher Education Policy, 21, 29–48
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos. (2024). Main Science and Technology Indicators (MSTI).
Pizzarulli, F. (2024). Los senderos de desarrollo de la ciencia y tecnología de Argentina y China. Observatorio Latinoamérica-China, Universidad de Buenos Aires.
Pizzarulli, F., Conejero, P. y Rabosto, A. (2024). El estado actual de los sistemas de Ciencia y Tecnología de Argentina y China. Un panorama de sus principales indicadores.The current state of the Science and Technology systems of Argentina and China. An overview of their main indicators. Observatorio Latinoamérica-China, Universidad de Buenos Aires.
Red de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología. (2024). Red de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología - Iberoamericana e Interamericana-. https://www.ricyt.org/
Royal Society of London (Ed.). (2011). Knowledge, networks and nations: Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century.
Springer Nature. (2024). Nature Index 2023.
Sugimoto, C. R. y Larivière, V. (2018). Measuring Research: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press.
Tokatlian, J. G. y Pomeraniec, H. (2024). Consejos no solicitados sobre política internacional: Conversaciones con Hinde Pomeraniec. Siglo XXI Editores.
Urdinez, F. y Myers, M. (2024). Regional repository of Chinese investments in Latin America. ICLAC and Inter-American Dialogue. https://iclac.cl/mapa-repositorio-regional-de-inversiones-chinas/
Wagner, C. S., Whetsell, T. y Leydesdorff, L. (2016). Growth of International Cooperation in Science: Revisiting Six Case Studies (arXiv:1612.07208). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1612.07208
Wagner, C. S. (2018). The Collaborative Era in Science: Governing the Network. Palgrave Macmillan.
Wagner, C. S. y Cai, X. (2022). Changes in co-publication patterns among China, the European Union (28) and the United States of America, 2016-2021 (arXiv:2202.00453). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.00453
Yunxia, Y. y Chen, Y. (2022). Development and assessment of Sino-Latin America and the Caribbean economic and trade cooperation. En China’s Trade Policy in Latin America: Puzzles, Transformations and Impacts (pp. 43–62). Springer International Publishing.
Zhou, Y. y Liu, X. (2016). Evolution of Chinese state policies on innovation. En China as an Innovation Nation (pp. 33–67).
Zhou, P. y Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy, 35(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.006